MINUTES OF MEETING REUNION WEST
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRJCT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Reunion West Community Development District was held on Thursday, May 13, 2021 at 11:30 a.m. at Heritage Crossing Community Center, 7715 Heritage Crossing Way, Reunion, FL.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Mark Greenstein Sharon Harley Graham Staley

Also present were:

Tricia Adams Kristen Trucco Steve Boyd Alan Scheerer

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager District Counsel District Engineer
Field Operations Manager

Roll Call

Ms. Adams called the meeting to order at 11:30 a.m. and called the roll. Three board members were present constituting a quorum.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period
Ms. Adams: The next item on the agenda is the public comment period. This is an opportunity for any members of the public to make a statement to the Board of Supervisors. We will take members of the public who are here physically at Heritage Crossings first. If you do want to make a comment to the Board of Supervisors, please state your first and last name for the record as well as your address and please limit your comments to three minutes. Is there anyone here who would like to make a comment to the Board of Supervisors?
Mr. Robert Eichorn (375 Muirfield Loop): I'm sure you have heard of that street. I have a couple of things if you will bear with me. Mainly, and I am speaking from Muirfield Loop, the garbage cans are extreme. My little bit of thought is we do the garbage cans four days. a week. Saturday, Monday, and Thursday. Then you have the recycle trash cans. That's four days a week that I have big trash cans on my street every week. Now what happens, somebody comes in and it's Sunday. I am going to leave and I am going to put my trash out Sunday. That's human nature

and what they should do. So, it sits there Sunday. Half the people if they are guests or not guests, if they are sitting there Sunday, they come and they pick it up Monday and they sometimes don't bring it up until Tuesday. So, basically, if you follow my thinking, I have trash cans seven days a week. It's my view every day. Muirfield Loop has a lot of expensive homes. I spent a lot of money and so did everybody on that deal. That is not what I paid for. I did not pay for that. I did not want that. I understand with guests and all that, but at the same time somebody has to look around and say, "this isn't right." And it's not right for me as a resident here to look out every morning. I have either a full trashcan, I'm not going to get into the overflowing ones, or an empty trashcan in the street. Or it's on my yard or your yard, it's every day seven days a week.
Ms. Adams: We are coming right up on time. Besides garbage collection is there anything
else?
Mr. Eichorn: I use one trashcan. Usually, it's on a Monday or a Thursday. I use it once.
Who empties their trash three times a week? You don't. I don't know who actually lives here, but I'm pretty sure that none of you take out your garbage three days a week.
Mr. Greenstein: Bob, Tricia is trying to determine if you have any other issues that we have jurisdiction over? We do not have jurisdiction over the garbage can trash problem, but we will forward this information to the master of the HOA. We just want to know; do you have any other issues that pertain to the CDD?
Mr. Eichorn: Well, maybe I am not at the right place, I just wanted somebody to hear me. Ms. Adams: I understand. As the Chairman said, we will forward your comments to the
HOA. Is there any other comment you wanted to make to the CDD Board of Supervisors? And time is short, so we need to move quickly.
Mr. Eichorn: I have something else to say. I understand there are guests, I understand you can't do anything yet on that road because it is one side or not on both sides. I assume somebody is watching that or looking to some area where one day we can say one side parking or no parking on that street. I'm sure everybody brings that up all the time. I don't know if they do or not, but I am bringing it up. This really upset me about two weeks ago. I almost killed a kid. He was about four years old. I am going about two miles an hour when he jumped between those cars right on Muirfield Loop. It's every day. Whoever is in charge of lawsuits, death, care about the community. You better look at Muirfield because there is going to be a kid hurt, maimed, or dead. There is no question about it. It's as clear as my hand and my face. It's going to happen. There is no question. It will happen.

Ms. Adams: Thank you for your comments Mr. Eichorn. Your time is up. We're going to move on to others. Is there anyone else who has a comment for the Board of Supervisors? If you could please state your name and address.
Mr. Robert Walker (7818 Loxahatchee Court): A couple of things really quick. The garbage can thing, that's a HOA thing. So, they are the ones that issue the fine?
Mr. Scheerer: Yes.
Mr. Walker: Okay, I just want to clarify that. The second thing is, who is in charge of the security? The Sinclair gate, what are we doing about that? It's backed up all the time.
Ms. Adams: Just so the public is aware. This is not a question and answer session with the Board. The Board is scheduled to discuss the Sinclair gate traffic operation in the course of the business that they conduct in their meeting today.
Mr. Walker: Alright, that is fine.
Ms. Adams: Any other comments for the Board of Supervisors from anyone in the room? Mr. Walker: One more thing. The security force is under the CDD or HOA?
Ms. Adams: It's under the resort, however, it's a collaborative effort. There are multiple funding sources that contribute to security operations. You'll hear more about these matters as we go through the meeting. Are there any public callers who would like to make a comment to the Board of Supervisors? If you could please state your name and your address for the record.
Rodrigo, 7700 Raven: I have two requests. First, if you could please move the phone closer to the Board's speakers so we can hear. I will reiterate the thing that the other property owner just called out. I am extremely against allowing parking on the streets. It is a hazard.
Ms. Adams: Thank you. Are there any other callers who would like to make a public comment? Hearing none, I am going to mute that public line. You will be able to hear the meeting, but that way we will avoid any background noise from that line.

TIDRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Minutes of the April 8,
2021 Meeting
Ms. Adams: The next item on the agenda for Board consideration and discussion is included in your agenda packet are a draft of the meeting minutes from April 8, 2021. These are the meeting minutes just for the Reunion West CDD portion of the Board meeting in April. As you may recall, you also had a joint meeting session. Because of the length oftime of that meeting, that transcription is not yet available for Board review. That will be included in a future agenda packet. So, we have just the RWCDD meeting minutes from April. In advance of the meeting, I

did receive some comments from Supervisor Graham. The corrections were not substantive in nature so we do not need to address those right now, but those will be incorporated into the final version of the minutes that are posted on the website and in the records of proceedings. Are there any comments or questions? Do we have a motion to approve?

On MOTION by Mr. Staley, seconded by Ms. Harley, with all in favor, the Minutes of the April 8, 2021 Meeting, were approved as amended.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Landscape Maintenance
on County Roads
Ms. Adams: For the record I am going to mention that District counsel is not yet in attendance. I have texted and Jan may be popping on the line, I think there may have been a transportation issue in route. Just for the record I will make note when Kristen or Jan joins the meeting.
Ms. Trucco: Hi Tricia, this is actually Kristen Trucco. Hopefully you can hear me right now. I am on, and I am in route currently. I should be there shortly.
Ms. Adams: Sounds good, thanks for calling in. The next item is a discussion item for Board consideration. During recent Reunion East CDD Board meetings, the Board directed staff to investigate being relieved oflandscape obligations for county road 532 because of development on the south side of the road. The District plans to maintain the north side of the road and the median for 532 but not the south.side. Because there are several roads that are tied into the interlocal agreement with Osceola County, this is an opportunity for Reunion West to review the county roads that this District funds landscape maintenance on. Obviously, over the years there has been a great deal of development. The situation may have changed, so included in your agenda packet in section 4 is a color map. It's a Reunion map and it shows the three roads that are county roads that the District contributes funding for. Sinclair Road, Highway 532, and also Old Lake Wilson Road. The roadway that falls into this District's boundary is the Sinclair Road and Alan and I have discussed the situation. The Board may want to consider being relieved of landscape maintenance obligations from just north of that fairway ridge section, there is a lift station. Up through around the comer to the entrance of Encore Reunion West CDD. Now the Board can continue to fund maintenance in that area, but there is other development. There are other landscape enhancements. My understanding from Alan is that the primary responsibility is

mowing. This is primarily unirrigated bahia without a lot of improved landscape that the District has maintained over the years. This is ready for Board discussion.
Mr. Staley: Are we looking after both sides of Sinclair all the way from Old Lake Wilson to the entrance of Reunion?
Mr. Scheerer: Yes. We do back of sidewalk from Old Lake Wilson Road all the way to Tradition. There are two stormwater ponds on Happy Trails I believe that we also maintain as part of the stormwater system.
Ms. Adams: I think Supervisor Staley was talking about going north on Old Lake Wilson.
Mr. Greenstein: Basically what you are saying, and this is something that really wasn't clear to me personally, we are covering mowing of bahia in the island to include all of Sinclair Road. Is that a valid statement?
Mr. Scheerer: That is a valid statement.
Mr. Greenstein: Well, that's news. Because we don't have any real improvements in the area, because we've never discussed it. Although one time there was some discussion about trying to beautify Sinclair and our entrance, so it's similar to what we have on 532. I didn't realize that it included that area, let's just say east of 429. That it's in front of the apartment complex there. True, we do have Encore at Reunion West which is in that area, but it's not all of it. I guess if you laid it out where we have frontage, Reunion West CDD property is basically fronting most of Sinclair Road. I'm kind of digesting this as I go. There is only a small piece and it's really the Sentosa apartment piece that isn't ours.
Mr. Scheerer: It's actually two apartment pieces in there. Mr. Greenstein: 90% of it is ours.
Ms. Harley: It's still the impression people are going to get as they are approaching the
resorts.
Mr. Greenstein: But the idea is all we have is grass that only grows when it rains. It's not
watered. It's not irrigated. It's a mowing expense. Dollar wise, do you have any idea what we are talking about?
Mr. Scheerer: Maybe I can find out by the end of the meeting. I'm not sure.
Mr. Greenstein: I always considered this to be a rather insignificant expense. To know that we aren't mowing it at the same time we're mowing other property adjacent to it on the Reunion side of Sinclair Road, everything is kept tidy. I don't know what the county would do. What schedule the county would have relative to mowing that section.

Ms. Harley: I think it's far better for us to maintain that and make sure that we have a consistent appearance to our community.
Mr. Scheerer: Those improvements that have been made where the street trees are St. Augustine, it's all irrigated and we don't maintain any of that. The median, we maintain all of the median.
Mr. Staley: If we let that get three feet high people are not going to be happy with that. I think it would be nice to know what the cost is if you have someone that can tell us that.
Mr. Scheerer: We can get that broken out for the Board.
Mr. Greenstein: I think we will see that it's rather insignificant. Mr. Staley: Well, there have been some challenges in the budget.
Mr. Greenstein: Anywhere we can save, we can save. That's fine. But again, most of that stretch of Sinclair Road with the exception of the piece where that new apartment complex is just east of 429, every part of that is bounded by Reunion West CDD property and that's the reason why we started maintaining that in the first place. Even when that part of Sinclair Road was undeveloped.
Mr. Staley: I think we can talk about another topic on the same subject. I have always wondered why we don't have any trees on the side of the golf course on the 12th hole of Nicklaus. From where the pumping station is or the electrical substation.
Mr. Scheerer: No water.
Mr. Staley: There is no water there?
Mr. Greenstein: Because it's outside. It's basically a county road. It's Sinclair Road and we may be bound to it but there are no properties and there are no homes facing Sinclair Road. It's the golf course that bounds Sinclair Road. So, they never did any irrigation.
Mr. Staley: I think probably on our list for the future we need to find a way to beautify that as we approach the resort as well.
Mr. Greenstein: This subject has come up several times over the years and when we talk about the price tag it kind of gets pushed aside. But we can revisit that.
Mr. Staley: Okay, and when we get to the budget you'll hear me talk a lot about five-year vision. We have to have a five-year vision for the CDD. We can't just keep going from meeting to meeting. That's what the reserve study I thought was going to help with.
Mr. Greenstein: Exactly, the reserve study obviously projects out greatly. Mr. Staley: It will cost money, but we need to have a plan for that.

Ms. Adams: I think we have clear direction that the ability to control the maintenance of the landscape on Sinclair is well worth the expense. We will follow up with providing an estimate on what that expense is, just for informational purposes for the Board but we are not going to include any changes to Sinclair Road when we propose the changes to the interlocal agreement. That's clear direction, I don't think we need to memorialize that with an action.
Mr. Greenstein: Maintaining status quo.
Ms. Adams: Maintaining status quo, exactly.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Resolution	2021-07
Approving the Proposed Fiscal Year 2022 Budget and Setting a Public Hearing
Ms. Adams: This resolution will adopt a proposed budget. It approves a proposed budget and it also sets your public hearing for final budget adoption which will be in August. The proposed budget is a first look. The Board has the ability to change the budget at any upcoming Board meeting up through the budget adoption in August which is the second Thursday in August. We are facing some deadlines; we do need to report the proposed O&M assessment rate to the county by June 15th each year. In preparation for this meeting, we did distribute a proposed budget in the agenda packet and last night we circulated a revised proposed budget. The revised proposed budget had several changes and rather than recognizing a carry forward surplus to balance the budget, it presented a balanced budget with the O&M fees and expenses. The budget that circulated last night also contemplated a contribution to the capital fund based on the share of platted lots that you have, and the amount was in sync with what the Reserve Study is recommending. First of all, are there any general questions on the budget process or the important deadlines? Realizing that this circulated last night, one thing that the Board does have flexibility on, your meeting in June is early in the month, I believe it falls on the 8th•    If the Board wants to defer adoption of this resolution until next month you do have that ability. If you are ready to approve a proposed budget amount today, we can do that as well. You have some flexibility of either going through the process today or deferring to next month if you need time for additional analysis or consideration, so bare that in mind.
Mr. Staley: I have a few. I think it's one of the most important things we do. Honestly, we could have a two hour session on this I think. Based on what I want to know about this budget, Mark would probably tell me that's not necessary. I think if we're going to go forward with and propose a significant increase to the assessment to the public, I am not going stand in front of the

public on August the 12th and recommend that. I come back to the reserve study. I am not used to looking to budget without a vision of the years ahead of it to see where we are headed. So, that's a long discussion in my view.
Mr. Greenstein: Okay, let me just clarify something. Number one, the timing of the process is controlled in order to meet public notice requirements we have to have a proposed budget adopted. It's just a proposed budget. You can put the word draft on it. We have and we will fine tune and change items in the budget between now and the time of the hearing in August. The other thing is, just to be clear, this budget represents no increase in assessments.
Ms. Adams: No. For Reunion East it represents a level increase in assessments. For Reunion West, ultimately, staffs recommendation is to increase the assessment. The reason for that is because the contributions to the R&M fund as well as being able to balance the budget without recognizing that carry forward. When we were scrutinizing the numbers, your end of year balance, the amount that you'll need to have for an operating reserve, which is that first quarter of the fiscal year before the tax revenues start to come in and are transmitted to the District, we are on an operating reserve for three months. Because of those amounts, ultimately, we recognize that there is some stress on the current assessment level and staff is recommending an increase. However, this is a policy decision that is up to the Board of Supervisors. If you want to keep your assessment level, we do need to recognize that $279,000 in carry forward surplus in order to balance the budget and you would not have the ability to contribute to the R&M Capital Fund for the upcoming fiscal year.
Mr. Staley: And that's basically the change you made between Tuesday and now. Ms. Adams: Yes.
Mr. Staley: In that case, I think we need to look at it in much more detail.
Mr. Greenstein: I totally agree. As long as we can take this action for the West relative to the budget and setting the budget hearing date in August, we can do it at the June meeting, there is no problem in delaying action on this resolution.
Mr. Staley: Can we set a conference call, or something to go through details? I am just conscious of people on the phone or people in the audience not being able to understand what we are talking about.
Ms. Adams: Historically at this District there has not been a budget workshop. However, that's a Board decision. If you wanted to schedule a workshop you have the ability to do so. As a matter of fact, if you want to schedule a workshop you would be prohibited from taking any

action, you couldn't make any motions or provide explicit staff direction, but a workshop could be held 100% virtually where all Board members and public can attend on Zoom. You don't have to meet the physical quorum requirement for a workshop. You do have that ability to schedule a workshop. The Board always has the ability to continue a meeting. For whatever reason you don't want to wait until your June meeting and you want to have further budget discussions and take action before your June meeting, you can continue the meeting. You have several options. Deferring the adoption of the resolution until June, taking action today, or continuing the meeting and taking action, or having a workshop and then presumably a shorter June meeting.
Ms. Harley: If we continue the meeting, you can set that up for another day?
Ms. Adams: What we would do today, there would be no motion to adjourn we would be continuing the meeting at a certain time and place that we announce before the end of the meeting.
Ms. Harley: And does that then have to involve public as well?
Ms. Adams: Yes. Any Board meeting has to have public access. All of the public that are here today as well as callers on the phone, they would hear the announcement of the time and the place, and they could obviously choose whether their schedule is suited to attendance or not.
Mr. Staley: In all honesty, I don't think I can do my job as a supervisor without at least a workshop. I want to understand this year's forecast. Alike, for next year's budget I want to understand the Reserve Study and how we planned that expenditure in this budget. And for future years I want to see what that would look like in terms of assessments for future years. I want to understand how Encore Reunion effects the budget. It's complicated, and I know I am a picky person, but that's what I feel like I need to do in order to be able sign off on it.
Mr. Greenstein: We can do a budget workshop. We just need to agree upon a date.
Ms. Adams: I'll draw your attention to a few of the most pertinent issues that the Board will want to be aware of with the proposed budget that was distributed last night via electronic mail and then handed out today. The first section of the revenue, the special assessment tax collector, all of the parcels in Reunion West CDD have been platted. They are all on the tax roll. When you are talking about the impact of various parcels and what not, Supervisor Staley, all of the parcels are on the tax roll, and they will all be assessed an O&M fee on their tax bill. I also what to draw your attention to the table where we are identifying the proposed assessment increase. On page three of your proposed budget the bottom column shows your assessment levels for Fiscal Year 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and what is proposed in this budget for Fiscal Year 2022. The proposed assessment level for multifamily homes is $750.97 which represents a $199

increase from previous years. The single family homes, the proposed assessment level is
$1,001.29. That represents a $265 increase from previous years. In previous years I believe the Board for Reunion West has not budgeted for contributions to the R&M fund so that would be a significant change this year. Also, overall, we are starting to realize more expenses because of the different areas such as Encore Reunion West as well as Reunion Village are now being developed and so the landscape maintenance, the pond maintenance, the security services for those areas are factored into the budget to the extent that the District expects an obligation.
Mr. Staley: In four years the assessment is doubling. It's because everything is changing, but I think if I were sitting at the back as the public in the budget meeting in August, I'd be wanting to know what it will look like for the next four years. Is it going to double again? I think we have to have at least some insight into that because we have the reserve study now and we know what we need to do for the next five years. And obviously we now have the Encore Reunion numbers which we can extrapolate. I don't think it's a huge exercise to do a top line, very high level, sort of five-year plan. But I think with that map, we are not sure where we are headed. And if I was in the audience, like I said, I would want to know that. I hope we have the authority to set whatever assessments we want to set.
Ms. Adams: If there is general consensus on the Board that there is going to be an assessment increase the Board can choose to set that level today. That amount can be reduced at the budget adoption at your budget hearing in August, but it cannot increase once it has been noticed. This budget takes into account all of the shared expenses, the capital plans that this Board has discussed, as well as capital projects that are noted in the reserve study and that the field manager has noted. Everything is included in terms of expenses so the Board has the ability to sharpen your pencil so to speak over the upcoming months and the assessment level, if the Board chooses, can be reduced from what you noticed. There is 60 day notice requirement to the County in advance of the budget hearing. There is also a mailed notice requirement that goes out to property owners in the District. Then there is also the newspaper advertising notice requirements. The amount that is noticed there is a cap. The Board cannot go higher than that. You can always go lower.
Mr. Staley: Ifwe take no action today, we could add a workshop in the next two or three weeks, agree on what we want to do, and approve that at the Board meeting in June.
Ms. Adams: Yes. We looked very carefully at the calendar yesterday, and there are 63 days between your June meeting and your August meeting which is adequate time to notify the

proper authority and then the mailed notice in 14 and 21 day newspaper notices, there is plenty of time to do that. The answer to your question is yes you can meet your notice obligations by making a decision at your June meeting.
Mr. Staley: Sharron and Mark, if that's okay I would really like the opportunity to do a workshop.
Mr. Greenstein: I agree, it's going to clarify a lot of things for you personally as a new Board member. It will be fully transparent as the decisions the Board has had to make and will be making, relative to how we deal with the shortfall. Why don't we set up a date for a workshop?
Ms. Adams: Alright, the workshop will require a 7 day notice, so we need to schedule that at least ten days out in order to adequately notice the workshop in the paper. The reason that we need that notice is to avoid any conflict with Sunshine laws since Board members are going to be discussing Board matters. Even though you are not taking action at the workshop we still need to have it noticed. What I am hearing the Board say is that you are comfortable with a workshop where everyone can Zoom in. We will set it up as a workshop where Board members and staff can communicate throughout the process. We can also schedule a public comment period where any members of the public can ask questions of the Board if you would like to structure it that way.
Mr. Staley: I think it is probably better in terms of hearing what we have to say.
Ms. Adams: Yes. Even the masks muffle the audio. It is a difficult situation with masks for callers to hear clearly.
Ms. Adams: Do any Board Members have suggestions for dates that you would like to attend the workshop?
Mr. Staley: The 25th of May?
Ms. Adams: I would be available around 1:00 p.m. I have a meeting in Hillsborough that morning. Any time after 1:00 or 1:30.
Mr. Sheerer: Tricia, I have two meetings that afternoon.
Ms. Adams: His meeting starts at 3:00. Ifwe are going to be tight that day, the 21st is open for both Alan and me.
Mr. Staley: The 21st gives us a few more days afterwards to finalize anything.
Ms. Adams:· Yeah, we are really close on the 7 day notice though. I don't know that we can get a 7 day notice out because today is the 13th•

Mr. Greenstein: Well, the main thing is that we do it with enough time to make adjustments which I don't think will take a lot of time. I think all of the moving pieces are in there, we just need to scrutinize them and make some decisions on them. The meeting for next month is the 8th and we've got Memorial Day weekend.
Ms. Adams: Oh, I am sorry, the meeting for June is June 10th•
Ms. Harley: What about the 26th or 2-r11?
Mr. Staley: I am okay with most of the next three weeks apart from the 22nd•    I can do the

Ms. Adams: The morning of the 26th is good. Do you want to do 10:00 a.m.? We will schedule the workshop for 10:00 a.m. May 26th. It will be a Zoom workshop. There will be a webinar presenter link provided to Board members and staff. There will be public Zoom participant information on the CDD website, in the public notice, and I would be happy to send out an announcement via the association POA email system if the Board would like.
Ms. Trucco: It would be a good way for residents to contribute any insights or opinions they have about the upcoming budget and what they would like to see.
Mr. Greenstein: Is it routine matter if we can have Artemis send out our notices on Monday?
Ms. Adams: Yes. That was not on Artemis.
Mr. Greenstein: Monday of the week that we are having the meeting we will put the notice

out.

Ms. Adams: Understood, including the workshop for May 26th.
Mr. Greenstein: The more people understand what we are dealing with the more people

will appreciate what we are doing.
Ms. Trucco: Okay, does that mean this meeting is being continued, I am sorry if I may have missed that.
Ms. Adams: No.
Ms. Trucco: Okay. This will just be back on the agenda at the next meeting.
Ms. Adams: Exactly, because we have time before the June 15th deadline for them to take action in June and still meet all of the noticing requirements. We will adjourn today; we have a workshop scheduled. We will notify Michael and David regarding the workshop and I'll see if our accounting staff can join as well because that might be helpful. If the Board would like to get

an overview of the budget, that's fine today. If you would prefer to digest it and email questions in advance to the workshop that's fine. How would the Board like to proceed?
Mr. Staley: Personally, I am ready for the detailed discussion on the 26th. The one thing I would ask to look at between now and then is I noticed that a lot of the budget line items are very much reflecting last year's budget and don't reflect so much this year's actuals. That's something perhaps that I will be talking about a lot. I think we have to really spend time on some of these line items if we are going to minimize the assessment increase. And as I said I'll share some ideas on how we should be thinking about the future year's oversite, because that bothered me as well.
Mr. Greenstein: Well, I can tell you for a fact that the actuals are considered and that we have financial reports. What you are looking for is an integrated package, which is not a difficult thing to do. Actual should always be reflected and has been reflected because there are adjustments made from year to year. But this first budget was always viewed, Graham, as sort of a place holder budget, a budget that gets us where we can go ahead and schedule the hearing. And all the budget activity occurs between that date today and the budget hearing. But now, I think this is a good move and we will get into the nitty gritty of things. And fully transparent. That's good.
Ms. Adams: Alright, sounds good. So, we are going to defer Resolution 2021-07 until the
June 10th meeting.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Proposal	from
Fausnight Stripe & Line to Install No Parking Signs at Encore
Ms. Adams: The next item in your agenda is under tab six. There is consideration of a proposal from Fausnight for "No Parking" signs at Encore at Reunion West. As the Board members recall during last month's meeting, you held a rule hearing and you adopted parking restrictions for certain streets at Encore West. Those are reflected on the backside of the proposal. We now have an engineered layout reflecting which side of the street has prohibited parking per your rule hearing. As a result of that rule hearing, staff gathered a proposal to install corresponding "No Parking" signs. However, we have been contacted by the property owner's association at Encore Reunion West and at this time they are asking that we hold off on any action on this item. So, it is staff recommendation right now that we keep this proposal on hold and that we monitor

the parking situation over at Encore Reunion West before the Board takes further action on this matter.
Mr. Staley: What is that monitoring process focusing on?
Ms. Adams: If there are any issues with the flow of traffic or with emergency vehicles being able to access all of the roads in that section of property.
Ms. Trucco: And I will just add without the signs we do not have the right to tow under Florida law. So that's a consideration. Without placing the signs, we do not have a right to tow. If we are going to tow vehicles, the signs must be installed.
Ms. Harley: Vehicles can actually park on the street, but not for more than 24 hours, correct?
Ms. Adams: Are you talking about HOA docs?
Ms. Harley: Yes.
Ms. Adams: The HOA does not own the roads, so their documents are not relevant to towing enforcement on the roads. The roads are owned by the District and that is why we needed to go through that rule hearing process in order to adopt policies regarding parking rules.
Ms. Harley: I just want to be clear; it will be a request for no parking on the street. But it's not enforceable unless we make a decision on it, correct?
Ms. Adams: Yes. It's not enforceable by the District unless the signage is installed and there are proper agreements in place for enforcement and an agreement with the towing company and the appropriate towing signage is installed at the community entrance.
Mr. Greenstein: So, we are effectively delaying implementation by not hanging the signs. Ms. Adams: Correct.
Mr. Greenstein: We'll monitor the situation and hopefully between now and next meeting we will get further clarity.
Ms. Harley: It is the wish of the Board.
Mr. Greenstein: We acted on the issue for our meeting. We had a lively discussion about the needs and safety, and I thought we drew a conclusion that this was the proper thing to do.
Ms. Harley: I think the Board and the HOA Board for Encore revisited the subject and discussed it amongst themselves and decided that they were prepared to go back to no action.
Ms. Adams: At this time staff is recommending that you do not take any action on this proposal. This proposal will still be valid for a time. You have the parking rules in place. If in the future the Board takes action to install signage and enter into agreements for enforcement, enter

into agreements for towing services, etcetera, that would require several additional steps that the Board would need to approve.
Mr. Staley: Is it possible within the laws that we can allow the Chairman of the POA to
say why they want the installation to be held off?
Ms. Marita Fullerton: I am over at Wilmington, also Board President for the POA. Long story short, when we initially approached the CDD it was because we don't have jurisdiction over the roads. Our community is set up differently from Reunion Resort itself. The width of the road and all of it is slightly different. What we wanted initially what we were hoping to do is for you guys to allow us to be the designee. So that we could figure out what it is what we wanted for our community. We do have a towing issue. We can't tow without a proper policy in place. Unfortunately, somewhere in that communication, what I think was interpreted and what resulted was to take what was already happening with Reunion Resort, which was one side of parking and simply apply it to our side. The Board feels, especially with the influx of information coming in from other homeowners, that the signage which we interpreted as being deprivation to the beatification of the community, we don't want that. We feel that it's possible that we can work with our security team to actively request people who are parking on the street to park elsewhere. Between the two, that's what we are hoping for.
Mr. Staley: We have tried to actively request people to move within Reunion and it doesn't
work. People don't actively respond. The actively dis-respond.
Ms. Trucco: Those rules are effective now. They were adopted by the Board, so they are effective. As far as us enforcing them, that's what this Board can decide not to do. But they are owned and maintained by the District as far as transferring designee rights.
Ms. Fullerton: That was initially. When we first presented to the Board that was the initial hope. To allow us to go in and do a review of our community and what serves our community best. Because it is not necessarily what works for everyone. That was what the end resulted in. We appreciated Alan's efforts in coming in and figuring out how a one-sided approach would work best for our community, but at the same time we are not on Board with the idea.
Ms. Trucco: I certainly understand the aesthetic difference with the signage, those signs are required under Florida statute.
Ms. Fullerton: Exactly, and I understand that. Something we would like to pursue, not at this moment, but is to have a conversation and confirm the signage requirements. Because there

seems to be a discrepancy between our understanding on what the signage requirements are versus a sign every couple of feet that we are being told is the next step.
Ms. Trucco: Sure, I am happy to provide that statute section for you.
Mr. Staley: I would like to propose that we ask everyone to work together with the staff to reach a recommendation for our next meeting. Because I think we do need to make a decision.
Ms. Adams: So, the recommendation right now is to not take any action and we will monitor the situation.
Mr. Greenstein: Just for clarification to confirm from my recollection of the events, absent a comprehensive plan, absent any plan from the community, we discussed the issue and with the primary concern being that of safety we adopted the rule to include another portion of the Reunion West CDD and a similar matter from what we had done within Reunion East and Reunion West. So, if now we are being told you have a better idea, then I think we need to know that idea right away.
Ms. Adams: I think there may have been some discussion last month when the issue was
presented that the POA was leaning towards restricting all street parking. The concern from the Board was that if all street parking is restricted it would be too prohibitive for guests and for visitors in the community and that it was just not feasible.
Mr. Greenstein: Thank you for refreshing my memory. The action we took when you compare it to what we have proposed was less restrictive than what was even being proposed?
Ms. Adams: What was requested by the POA.
Mr. Greenstein: Yes, okay. I think between now and the next meeting we need to receive a proposal from the POA for Encore Reunion West as to what they want us to consider. Because we judicated it, made a decision, we are in the implementation phase, and I have no problem holding off on implementation for 30 days. But if they have a better approach to this, we need to know.
Steve Goldstein: You're concerned about the signs. You think they are ugly. We had some people who didn't like them at first, but they have been up months now and I have heard no complaints about anybody in this community saying they do not like the signs. It sure helps with the safety being on the streets here. They are ugly. I thought the first two weeks they were up I saw them every time I drove. I don't even see them anymore. You get used to them being there.

Ms. Fullerton: And there is truth to that. I think what we were hoping to do is preserve as much as possible. Some people want no street parking and allow limited street parking during peak times.
Ms. Harley: I will motion to delay our decision on signage.
Ms. Adams: The Board does not need to take any action. We will just simply not take any action on this matter.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion	of	Central	Florida
Expressway Public Workshop Notice
Ms. Adams: The next item is included in the agenda packet for informational purposes only. This is regarding the Central Florida Expressway public workshop. Included in your agenda packet in tab 7 is a notice that has been provided to the district regarding the upcoming workshop proposing widening 532 Osceola Polk Line Road. As the Board is aware, there is quite a bit of road construction planned in this neck of the woods. There is a workshop scheduled at Reunion Resort  right  here  and  that  is  coming  up  in  the  month  of  May  on  the  25th•    I  believe  that  the association as distributed this via email blast to those who have an email address on file. This is for informational purposes only. This is not a District matter; we're just simply providing the information and increasing public awareness.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Presentation of Final Reserve Study
Ms. Adams: The next item in your agenda packet is presentation of the final Reserve Study. When we presented the draft reserve study staff noted that we had a couple of comments regarding deferring some of the items based on the actual field conditions. There was a deferring of certain items and no other substantive changes other than it is notable that the inflation rate was increased to 3% which is ultimately the maximum that the reserve advisors would recommend. They recommended no higher than that based on history. I know the Board has looked at this report on numerous occasions. If there are any questions I am happy to answer, otherwise we would just need a motion to accept the reserve study.

On MOTION by Mr. Staley, seconded by Mr. Greenstein, with all in favor, the Final Reserve Study, was approved.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
Attorney

Staff Reports

Ms. Trucco: We have nothing in particular to report to the Board today. We would say that an agreement with Kingwood is in negotiation right now with a few terms. So, hopefully that will be finished up by the time you see us next month. With respect to the bond issuance, we're waiting on a permitting issue so that is just on hold for right now. Otherwise, we have nothing new to report to the Board today. Thank you.

Engineer
Ms. Boyd: I don't have anything to bring up but I think we can discuss most of my items when you go through action items.
Ms. Adams: Sounds good.

District Manager's Report
Action Items List
Ms. Adams: Under District Manager's Report included in your agenda packet in section 9, tab C is an action items list. This includes items for Reunion East CDD as well as Reunion West CDD. Starting on page 3 is Reunion West CDD. The first item is the reserve study. That is complete and that will be taken off the action item list.
The next item on the study is regarding recent discussion the Board has had about amenity development over at Grand Traverse Parkway and Valhalla. The Board approved a scope. There is an extremely rough cost estimate included in your proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2022 regarding the development of a playground and outdoor fitness station on the respective parcels. Information has been conveyed to the district engineer and he has reviewed that, and I believe he has some recommendations.
Mr. Boyd: Sure. Both of those locations the first thing that needs to be done is we do need a hard survey of those areas. Then really, as opposed to the improvements to get a quality product I recommend that we engage a landscape architect to come up with a program for those amenity areas, what type of equipment should be specified, what size, and to provide the associated sidewalks and landscape plantings for the areas. Traditionally, landscape architects design amenity features like that. There are at least two that I work with on a team basis that are small one person type shops that I think would be very efficient for you and complete that. But the first thing that we need is a actual field inspection of those areas establishing the legal boundary of those tracts, which is platted so that's not a big issue. With topography, utilities or any other features that are there would impact the design. I can proceed with getting ASM to provide that
quote and if there is some sort of mechanism that they can proceed, assuming their numbers are

not out of range, and then at the same time I can work with getting you a couple of fee proposals for landscape architects.
Mr. Staley: Can I recommend that the Chairman be authorized to approve such estimates?
Ms. Adams: Steve, do you think it's realistic that they will come in well in advance of
June 10th?
Mr. Boyd: Yes.
Ms. Adams: Okay. This item is on your action items list. It's not explicitly on the agenda for the Board to take action so the Board can take action, but it does require an opportunity for public input. So, Supervisor Staley, I just want to frame the motion. You want to delegate authority to the Chairman to approve the cost for the proposal for the survey as well as the landscape architect services, is that correct?
Mr. Staley: That's what I meant.
Ms. Adams: We have a motion; do we have a second? Ms. Harley: I second.
Ms. Adams: Did we have any public comment regarding the Board taking action on this item? Hearing none, any further Board discussion?
Mr. Greenstein: I just want to clarify; this is basically an administrative task that is required to develop any piece of property. It must be staked out properly, have a survey, and the fact that our engineer is recommending that we employ a landscape architect is basically the second part of the administrative process. I think it is important that we take these steps now to keep this item moving.

On MOTION by Mr. Staley, seconded by Ms. Harley, with all in favor, Delegating Authority to the Chair to Authorize Approval of Proposals for Land Survey and Landscape Architect, was approved.

Ms. Adams: The next item in the action item list is the lighting of monuments and I believe there might have been an issue with Duke, and I believe Alan has an update on this.
Mr. Scheerer: They had to switch out the transformers that were to be used to provide the electricity on Golden Bear. I understand that was done yesterday. The tap was bad that was allocated for that one monument and my understanding is it is supposed to be ready to go by Friday. The White Marsh Way one is up and running.
Ms. Adams: The next item is the Encore transition at Reunion West CDD. We are still
looking at common  area irrigation  and how that is metered.  We are also going to have further

discussion with the Board. I believe last month there were some very preliminary high level discussion regarding landscape services in that area. We are going to keep this on the action item list so that it doesn't slip through the cracks and when the Board is ready to discuss that it is here to be discussed.
Refunding the bonds; that is something that we are looking at next fiscal year.
Parking rules for Encore Reunion West the Board has already discussed.
Monitoring the elevation development near by Reunion. I will try to get a report in between the meetings and send that to the Board for an update. We do have several construction funds for bonds that need to be closed out and District counsel and District engineer I believe that is all in process and actively being worked on.
Sinclair gate. At recent Board meetings the suggestion was made that there was an emergency maintenance of traffic plan for times where there are nearby accidents on major roadways that start to redirect traffic through Sinclair. The district engineer had some initial thoughts on that, and I believe he has just a few thoughts to share with the Board.
Mr. Boyd: The thought there is to set up a station where Sinclair Road ends where you can have somebody in advance screening cars. But that requires county approval. I have reached out to the county engineer with the proposal, he has not responded. I just need to keep working on that and hopefully I can get you a report on that prior to next month.
Mr. Staley: Steve, could I ask, would that involve having some hard cones in the road?
Mr. Boyd: I think it would need cones to direct traffic.
Mr. Staley: The perfect thing to go down that would stop people cutting back over and solve the problem.
Mr. Boyd: That would be part of the plan.
Mr. Greenstein: The Resort has taken steps and security has taken step to employ additional officers and to locate themselves at the earliest point of relief, let's just call it, along Traditions Boulevard and sometimes down on Sinclair Road. To be able to do something of a more permanent nature, even though it would only be used on an as needed basis, would be great. The county initially has basically told us Sinclair Road is not our jurisdiction and we cannot impede, stop traffic, or do anything to better the situation overall. But it's good to know we have a more serious plan that we can get control at the point that it needs to be controlled from a practical standpoint.

Mr. Boyd: Another option may be some flashing signs that would suggest other alternate routes for traffic as they are approaching Reunion and not have them get all the way to the entrance and then tell them.
Mr. Greenstein: We'll see what happens, but that's good.
Ms. Adams: Any further discussion on Sinclair gate issues? The next item on your action items list;
The utility easement that's in process. The Board has already delegated authority to the Chairman to execute when that's finalized.
Last month there was some discussion regarding traffic calming on Heritage. Alan will be installing a speed limit sign in that vicinity.
Ms. Adams: Any further discussion regarding traffic calming on Heritage? We will take this first step and then monitor the situation and see if there are still concerns in that area.
Ms. Trucco: Can I just add that the TECO easement agreement. There are comments going back and forth right now, hopefully by next meeting we'll have the Chair sign.
Ms. Adams: That started during the cold snap a few months ago, so it will be good to have that done for next winter. It's a larger gas line. Last month there was some Board discussion regarding improvement of communication, and I needed to follow up with the Board and confirm various details of that. One item that was discussed by the Board the Board did not take any official action nor direct staff, but I perceived there was consensus regarding notifying residents of upcoming CDD meetings, so I did send out notice this month. It will be going out earlier in future months. Then there was also some discussion regarding summary notes of actions that the Board takes at the meetings. If the Board would like to direct district management staff, those could easily be added to the website. Summary notes are a summary of who was in attendance at the meeting, actions that the Board took, the outcome of votes, etcetera. It is a summary of the more salient actions.
Mr. Staley: My suggestion was not a three or four page summary; it was like a one page discussion. If there was a firm decision, right, put it in. It's got to be one page because people won't go to the website.
Ms. Adams: District management staff does execute summary notes for several Districts, and they are typically very rarely longer than one page. It is just a summary of actions that the Board has taken.

Mr. Staley: I know the HOA may not want to do this but if we could e-blast it as well. It matters that people get to know what is happening and they need to know what is being decided. That is a great initiative. Thank you.
Ms. Adams: Any further discussion on communication or suggestion? The other item that is in process, last month the Board approved the conversion from the metal halide and HPS streetlights to LED streetlights. You might have seen Duke workers out there verifying information, but that is all getting teed up for the transition. We will keep the Board informed of the status. Any questions for content regarding Reunion East that was included in the agenda packet?

Approval of Check Register
Ms. Adams: The next item on the agenda is approval of the check register. Include under tab 2 is a summary of the check run from April 1st through April 30, 2021. The total amount was
$457,260.51. The detailed check register is behind the summary. This is an item that requires Board action.

On MOTION by Mr. Staley, seconded by Mr. Greenstein, with all in favor, the Check Register, was approved.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Ms. Adams: Also included in your agenda packet is your unaudited financials through the month of March. This is provided for informational purposes only. The Board is not required to take any action. But if you have any questions regarding the financials, it does have your cash balance page on page 1. It also has your year to date budgeted amounts as well as your actual spending for administrative and maintenance costs. We've also included the costs for managing Seven Eagles. Then the next page on page 3 is your replacement and maintenance fund and your capital projects that have been approved and spent this year as well as what is scheduled. If there are no further questions, we will move on to the next item.

Presentation of Number of Registered Voters - 491
Ms. Adams: The next item on your agenda under tab 4 is presentation of the number of registered voters. Each year the District is required to report the number of registered voters as of April 15, 2021, there were 491 registered voters in Reunion West CDD. This is pertinent to the district because once a District hits 250 registered voters and six years of development then the

seats on the Board start to transition to residents within the District or qualified electors within the District. Any questions?
Mr. Greenstein: For clarification purposes on that issue, that would begin with the November of2022 election process?
Ms. Adams: I believe in November 2022 there will be three seats that will be on the general election electors qualify with the supervisor of elections office. If more than one qualified elector qualifies with the elections office than their name is placed on the ballot and residents when they vote at the general election in November for federal, state, and local office will also vote for the community development district seats.

Security Report
Ms. Adams: We also have a security report. This is a new report that the Board has requested to be apprised of each month regarding the parking violations and towing reports. This is information that has been prepared by Victor Vargas and his team. It was included for Board review. Are there any questions? We do have our security director, Victor, in the room today.
Mr. Staley: Personally, I don't know what other people think, I don't need the 79 pages. I think it would be better if you have an issue that you want to draw our attention to you could start that. But I think it will save trimming a few trees. I am curious, what do you count as an incident? Because you said there were six incidents all of which were towed. What classifies and incident for your report?
Mr. Vargas: Pretty much if a vehicle was parked by a fire hydrant, it will get towed. We'll
give it a chance, maybe two hours and if the vehicle is not moved, we will notify the towing company. The vehicle was parked in an empty lot. The vehicle was parked in front of the no parking area, we give it an hour almost two hours and if the vehicle is not moved after we tried to make contact with the owner of the vehicle, then we notify the towing company.
Mr. Staley: And as you said last time, the process is you try to contact the owner of the vehicle.
Mr. Vargas: Yes, depending on where the vehicle is parked. If we cannot make contact
with anyone then we will notify the towing company.
Mr. Greenstein: What if a vehicle is blocking a driveway?
Mr.. Vargas: Right now, the only thing that we do we just speak to them politely to see if they can move the vehicle. A lot of the time they are moving the vehicle. But right now I spoke

to Tricia about it, we also contact the code enforcement and we can notify the Sheriff's department and code enforcement. The Sheriff's department came, and they spoke to one of the owners and they were told that they can not enforce that. It is an HOA issue.
Ms. Adams: This has been discussed at various meetings before, but the challenge with that situation is that a majority of the vehicle is parked on the residents own private property with a small portion being parked over the sidewalk which is owned by the COD. Because of the majority of the vehicle being on private property the Sheriffs office has not been willing tow vehicles in that situation. Likewise, we are still conferring with legal counsel regarding the district's ability to tow when a majority of the vehicle is on private property. It just makes it a little trickier to deal with. So, we have been using a diplomatic approach, communication approach, urging code enforcement to come out and review the situations and enforce to their best ability.
Mr. Staley: There was also something this week which I think is important for the minutes. There was an incident which lead to a lot of social media chatter which communicated to the community that we have no right to bring the police in here to issue a ticket for a parking violation. I think in the minutes we should state very clearly that security has the authority and the ability to contact the Sheriff to issue a ticket for a parking violation.
Ms. Adams: Furthermore, residents have the ability to contact law enforcement.
Mr. Staley: If you can minute that precisely because there is a lot of confusion. And of course, because it was on Facebook, I couldn't correct it. Ifwe could just clarify that.
Ms. Adams: The statement we generally make is that these are public roads and traffic enforcement is the responsibility (in this case) of Osceola County Sheriffs Office.
Don Harding: Unfortunately, some of the officers coming into the site because it's a gated community they don't recognize it as being public roads. But they have as much responsibility to enforce the laws and the parking laws in this facility as they do anywhere else because these are public roads. I am in touch with the Sheriff Sergeant to tell him that he needs to reinstruct his police force that these are public roads and that they need to enforce the laws.
Resident: It seems that in a gated community or a group that's controlled by the District there seems to be some indication that we have to have some sort of traffic enforcement agreement.
Ms. Adams:  That's not correct. In some cases the county  may  request  one, and we are
happy to do that. If the county wants to have an agreement, we are happy to do that. Kristen and

her team have done this at numerous districts. But in no way is it required because these are public roads, but this is a common issue, and we want to work through it however we need to.
Ms. Trucco: You're exactly right, just to echo Tricia, for the record. The difference between that statute is that's a private community and those are private roads. The District is a special purpose and unit oflocal government. Anything we own is open to the public and we also by virtue of those statutes, we don't have police authority. We don't have the ability to go out there and write someone a ticket for speeding or parking.
Mr. Greenstein: I just want to clarify one thing following up on your comment, Graham, the detail Victor. Again, we don't need all of the detail information about each incident, but I think a summary report that shows the type of incident could go on one page. You're managing the program for us through an agreement with the HOA and therefore we have full confidence that you will bring to our attention any unusual activity. Any new incidents. We don't need all the detail, but a summary rollup of the type of incidents. Which is something we use to get in the past.
Ms. Harley: Ifl could just print off a report without having to go in and extract everything
manually. That can take up some time.
Ms. Adams: The towing can be isolated. Did you have to put together the towing report or could you isolate the towing incidents and print that out.
Mr. Vargas: Yes, I can separate the towing part. Ms. Adams: Can you isolate the parking violations? Mr. Vargas: I can try.
Ms. Adams: Okay. I think what would be pertinent for this Board is the parking violations and the towing because that is impactful to the districts parking enforcement rules.
Mr. Staley: I think something like "parking violations: six tows" and if there were a few break-ins, fine.
Mr. Greenstein: And the noteworthy piece in my mind would be the number of people who basically challenged the rules, are parking parallel to the street on the path. Which is neither a fish nor fowl. It's private property. That's the issue that we are hopefully going to get clarity on as to what we can do to enforce to get people to correct their behaviors and not take advantage of the situation because they are partially blocking the sidewalk.

Ms. Trucco: The district is permitted, and anyone is permitted to call if a law is being broken. My understanding is that is what Victor and his team are doing when a law is being broken. The only thing that we can do to enforce our rules is to call the towing company.
Steve Goldstein: What happens if we hire private police? Ms. Trucco: A lot of districts do that.
Steve Goldstein: Will they enforce them, is my question.
Ms. Trucco: I think that it varies. Tricia, what is your experience?
Mr. Greenstein: We can discuss that at the East meeting. I'm looking at the time, I know it's a common issue, so we can continue any discussion that we want to have at the East meeting.
Ms. Adams: Alright, we will defer any discussion regarding enhanced traffic enforcement to the Reunion East meeting.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business
Ms. Adams: Are there any other business or Supervisor's requests?
Mr. Staley: We had some public comment about the trash issue. There is nothing we can do about the trash issue, but I will just say to those people who have asked those questions, you really need to just continue to talk to the HOA. We had a request for one trash pickup a week, it would be absolutely chaos. You need to continue to speak to the HOA and they will do whatever they can and hopefully we'll get fme for abuse of the system. The other question that came on this was eliminating parking completely. I think we have dealt with that many times and one side
.of [the street] parking seems to be working. We have relied on Victor to enforce it.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor's Requests
There being no Supervisor's requests, the next item followed.

TWELTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Meeting Date
Ms. Adams: Your next meeting date is the-workshopat 10:00 a.m. on My 26th and then your next Board meeting is June 10th at 11:30 a.m.. A few months ago we adjusted this meeting time earlier, is the Board satisfied with the meting time?
Mr. Staley: Personally, I always feel like we are on a marathon sprint. We are always rushing to get finished by a certain time. I think we go to 11:00 a.m.. I know it's rough sitting in meetings, but there is a lot of stuff going on. Until the community understands what's going on,

I think we deserve that we make these issues made public and perhaps we can revisit it in the future. There is a lot going on.
Mr. Greenstein: What do we have to do notice wise if we change the meetings to 11:00
a.m.?
Ms. Adams: We need to re-notice the meetings at 11:00 a.m.. The Board adopts a meeting
schedule at the beginning of the fiscal year, and we typically notice all of those meetings. They are also posted on the website.
Ms. Trucco: A republishing expense.
Ms. Adams: Do we want to monitor for a couple more months?
Mr. Greenstein: Starting a new fiscal year we put out the new schedule. We went over a lot of material. Usually an hou and a half should be adequate, but we can continue to monitor it if we need more time.

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment
There being no further business, Ms. Adams called for a motion to adjourn.

On MOTION by Mr. Greenstein, seconded by Ms. Harley, with all in favor, the meeting was adjourned.